|
Enforcing Child Support
Interstate
The long arm of the law is now able to reach across
state boundaries to enforce support orders through
garnishment of wages or having the recalcitrant
parent's drivers or professional licenses revoked,
thanks to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
(UIFSA).
Following the lead of
25 other states, the North Carolina General Assembly
enacted legislation adopting UIFSA as Chapter 52C of
the General Statutes, effective January 1, 1996.
UIFSA replaces The Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of
Support Act (URESA), enacted in the 1950s. Though it
represented the first comprehensive attempt to deal
with the problem of interstate support enforcement,
over the years it was found to be ineffective,
cumbersome and time-consuming. In 1989 alone,
interstate child support cases made up approximately
30 percent of all child support cases in the United
States, and an estimated 2.5 million non-custodial
parents, mostly fathers, were nonresidents of the
states in which their children lived. At the time,
children were almost twice as likely not to receive
support from non-custodial parents in interstate
situations, as in cases where the non-custodial
parent and children live in the same state. In
addition, parents in interstate child support cases
paid, on average, only 60 percent of the child
support that they have been ordered to pay.
With UIFSA came
sweeping changes in child support enforcement laws,
making it much easier for a spouse dependent upon
child support to enforce support orders by creating
real-life consequences for dead-beat dads and moms.
In some respects, UIFSA is quite similar to URESA.
For example, UIFSA also retains much of the
terminology used by URESA, including the terms
"initiating" and "responding state." However, the
two acts differ in important ways:
- Under the old
law it was extremely difficult and expensive for
non-custodial parents to contest modification
requests, many of which were brought in states
located hundreds or even thousands of miles away
from their homes. In the future, all such
actions will be brought in the state where the
custodial parent resides.
- UIFSA also makes
it easier to garnish wages in another state. The
garnishment order can now be obtained in the
custodial parent’s home state and mailed
directly to the non-custodial parent's employer
in another state.
- Additionally,
parents who do not pay child support orders will
be subject to having driver's licenses or
professional licenses. Even passports can be
revoked for failure to pay child support orders.
A list of child support delinquencies will be
sent to the various licensing boards and these
boards will, in turn, send out notices to
recalcitrant parents indicating that they may be
subject to license suspension or revocation
unless they bring their payments up-to-date.
In North Carolina,
courts can exercise personal jurisdiction over
non-residents pursuant to UIFSA if any of the
following applies:
- the non-resident
was personally served with process in North
Carolina
- the non-resident
submits to jurisdiction here by consent, a
general appearance, or filing a responsive
pleading waiving the issue of lack of personal
jurisdiction
- the non-resident
resided at one time in North Carolina with the
child
- the non-resident
resided here at one time and provided prenatal
expenses or support for the child
- the child
resides here as a result of acts or directives
of the non-resident defendant
- the non-resident
engaged in an act of sexual intercourse in North
Carolina with the child's other parent, and the
child may have been conceived as a result of
that act
- the non-resident
has asserted paternity in the paternity registry
maintained in this state
- there is some
other basis for the exercise of personal
jurisdiction consistent with constitutional
principles
If you would like
more information on enforcing child support through
interstate channels, or would like to schedule a
consultation regarding your child support issues,
contact us.
For more information,
please see our page on
Child Support. |